A War On Evil? The War On Bad?
A War On Scary Stuff? A Nondescript Vague Enemy
That Promotes The Threat Of Never Ending War
NewsFocus Op/Ed, by Tim Watts -
112211 | Updated 2014
We all have a pretty
good idea. We know that it's a very bad thing for humanity.
We've been through enough of them in our lifetime to understand
the horror of war, but what actually is the true definition of
the concept, of the word itself?
a (1): a state of
usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states
or nations (2): a period
of such armed conflict (3):
state of war
2b: a struggle or
competition between opposing forces or for a particular end.
this basic clarification in mind, how do we reconcile the "War
On Terror" by such a simple definition?
the history of warfare have we had such a vague description for
a state of war.
War On Terror is very unique and new to the American
experience. The overall ramifications of this constitutionally
heretical concept are huge. Never before have we encountered
such a personal threat, unless maybe you were a
Japanese-American during World War II.
of this in mind, let's first take a quick historical review of
what is war and our experience with it. Let us first digress
about the state of war and why we fight.
again, to reiterate, we've never had such a vague outline for
war as we have with that of the War On Terror. Our wars
have always been defined. Our enemies have always been
identified, until now.
actually had a war known simply by its date, with the
war of 1812. We've even had the American Civil War, although it's hard to
figure how war can be civil. I'm being facetious of
course, since the latter reference is actually the
second definition of the term. The primary meaning is
civilian war, so at least that war had an appropriately definitive
name to it.
also had the Spanish-American war. That one is easy to figure
out, although it should be called the American-Spanish war
because the United States is thought by many to have instigated
that whole mess.
moved on to the mother of all wars with something new for
mankind, called World War. Since everyone is involved in
these global free for alls, we simply name them after the number
we've had. Sadly enough, so far we've had two such horrors, so
we call these World War I and World War II.
You would think that
after the shock and carnage of two world wars we might all just take a break for
awhile, but unfortunately that's not the case. One country it seems just can't
get enough of war, and that is undisputedly the United States. The US has been at
war for over a century, pretty much non-stop.
Sometimes we even like to
pretend that we're not at war, so we defer to calling our invasions as mere
conflicts, even though it is our military that is used to bomb and kill
hundreds of thousands on foreign soil. We did this with both Korea and Viet Nam,
but most people know better and now call them both for what they were, war.
War Is Rape
It may sound like a rude
metaphor to make, but when you get right down to it, in all reality... war is
It is a widespread
attack on a country and it's people, violently taking its resources and people
for imperialist/capitalistic gain.
In too many instances,
it is the stronger force imposing its will upon a weaker force. It is a blatant
disregard for human rights and personal privacy, at the highest level possible.
It is the consummation
of material goods and resources of another nation and its people, against
The perversity of it all
is that there is indeed a reward for war. There is a morbid pleasure as the
conquering force gets to enjoy the "spoils of war."
Throughout history, it's
undeniable that many country's have become larger and richer because of war.
Increased land, natural resources and wealth have made war quite profitable for
some, and not just for national governments, but the banking cartel that sits
For some, there is
enormous profit and a perverse pleasure to war.
When you look at the
totality of the unprovoked invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Libya, there is
only one conclusion that one can make... war is indeed rape.
So why is a
self-professed peaceful nation like the United States involved in so much
Our elected leaders will tell you that we're
"spreading democracy." We kill
scores of innocent civilians just so we can bring them our version of American
life. Of course that comes with the setting up of our corporations in their
country to exploit their natural resources for ourselves, but hey, who can argue
with the merits of greed based capitalism, versus a government system of the people taking
care of the people?
We call these latter
forms of governance any name except for democracy. Socialism and communism are
the evils we typically like to indoctrinate against, but despite all the
propaganda involved, one thing is clear... governments are only as good as the
moral qualities of those who lead them.
If Jesus comes back as
prophesied, what type of government will he advocate? Do you think he will side
with the money-changers, or espouse a government of people helping people? That
answer shouldn't require too much deep thought.
The US chooses instead
to spread democracy, which is actually nothing more than a system of mob rule,
for it is the 51% controlling the other 49%. That can hardly be defined as a
true democracy, by any stretch of the imagination, but that's what we've been
taught, indoctrinated to believe, through our history books in school.
Winston Churchill was famous for saying, "the victor writes the history,"
and so it is with the US.
So we as a nation like
to proudly beat our chests and scream loudly to the heavens about democracy and the "American way."
It's one of our favorite reasons for war,
but the system that we are truly pushing is unchecked corporate capitalism, not
the vision of our forefather's republic, that all men are created equal.
We pretty much go from country to country as we see fit,
fighting wars with whoever has the resources
that our corporations want the most of, and we push democracy at the long end
barrel of a gun. We'll gladly bomb the piss out of a country, destroying
centuries of civil infrastructure, just so we can set them free and give
And to think we were
worried about the Nazis. What would we think if another country stormed our soil
and told us how we were going to live? We got pretty uptight about the threat of
that during World War II.
Smedley D. Butler, is one
of the greatest unsung patriots this country never knew. He was a major-general with a long military background, but when he quit the army he was a
disillusioned man with contempt for the military establishment. Butler wrote in
his epic book, "War Is A Racket," that he was nothing more than a hired
thug to promote and protect the capitalist interests of the US. He described
himself as a racketeer for corporate America.
Ask yourself, why is it when we go to war it is
always "to protect US interests?"
Butler wouldn't be the
only general to warn us about the improprieties of war.
Beware The Military Industrial
President Dwight D.
Eisenhower tried to warn us all in
his final farewell message to the nation on January 17, 1961, when he spoke
dangers of the military industrial complex. It was quite a statement to make for a military lifer such as Ike. As he spoke, his eyes occasionally
darted left and right, as if expecting someone to try and cut him off before he
could deliver his dire prophesy. Eisenhower understood all too well about the
sinister power of the US military industrial complex and the powers that control
Fifty years later, our
nation labors under the mammoth behemoth described by Ike. We have become a
perpetual war machine, just as he warned us.
We have never known a
period where we weren't involved in war or "conflict" somewhere on the
globe. This is not an indictment upon the courageous men and women who have
bravely served our country, for they have been unwitting sacrificial lambs, mere
pawns for political and corporate ideology. The judgment and guilt of war falls
on those who instigate it for their personal profit.
(See military spending
for last ten years at the end of this article.)
War is not instigated by nations as
much as it is by the central banking institutions that control the governments
of the world who bow to them for money. That is an interesting concept in
itself, for sovereign nations are supposed to have the power to print money for
themselves, interest free, but that's what central banks do best, take
sovereignty from nations in return for war and debt. Quite a bargain.
In the past, when the
Federal Reserve led banking cartel wanted to push the nation into war, they
fabricated a reason. The US has done so with every war, but more so after the 1913
takeover by the Federal Reserve cabal.
We have always initiated these illegal
wars under the guise of "false
flag" operations, blaming the instigating atrocity on a foreign
flag so that we could justify a war with them. It's not a new deception. This
method has been employed for many centuries. It's an age old tactic that has
become even more prevalent in modern times.
(See false flags at the
end of this article.)
It's hard to argue which
false flag is the largest or most evil of all, since every one of them
has resulted in international war with tens of thousands to millions slaughtered
over a deliberate lie that had no regard whatsoever for human life.
War is big business.
There is no disputing that. Trillions of dollars are spent each year by the
nations of this earth, with many of them being serviced in one way or another by
the US military industrial complex. The US alone pours in three-quarters of a
trillion dollars per year to this war machine and that does not include the
One can't say that
Eisenhower was particularly prescient, but as a five-star general and President
of the United States he was acutely aware of the military and the industry that
spawned itself around it. He knew all too well about false flags and the
opportunity they presented to those behind the military industrial complex. War
is money to these parasites of humanity.
Make no mistake, Ike was
right about the military industrial complex.
The WOT Catalyst
One could argue that the
most prominent false flag that had the largest overall effect on the US and the
world has to be the 9/11 attacks. An
overnight police state was erected not only in the US, but around the world.
Orwell's dark vision soon became a reality.
If Bush and Cheney were so serious about
a War On Terror, then why did they resist an independent investigation of the
worst terror attack ever on US soil? Why did Bush drag his feet for 441 days,
well over a year, before finally giving in to public pressure for a 9/11 Commission
and an investigation?
Bush-Cheney regime was not big on investigating 9/11, they were certainly quick
to exploit it. The Bush administration quickly adopted an offensive stance that, for the
first time ever, publicly admitted to unprovoked preemptive warfare, something
it had never done before. This stance was originally developed by PNAC architect
Paul Wolfowitz, who became Deputy Secretary of Defense under Bush-Cheney. The
strategy became known as the Bush doctrine, but for all intents and purposes was
really the Wolfowitz doctrine.
The catalyst for this
immoral depravity was the 9/11 attacks.
The PNAC laden Bush administration
jumped at the chance to capitalize on their suspiciously fortuitous vision for a
new Pearl Harbor. I use the term suspiciously because many openly question their
uncanny prescience of the event, one year to the month after they first published their
dubious manifesto titled, "Rebuilding
America's Defenses. (Sept. 2000)
result of numerous incriminating government implications, the 9/11
attacks soon became looked at as yet another false flag event, the PNAC's
prophecy fulfilling new Pearl Harbor.
9/11 attacks soon became the foundation for sweeping reforms in the US,
with the passage of anti-Constitution legislation such as the heinous Patriot Act,
Military Commissions Act, as well as
establishing the Hitler-esque Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and the Total
Information Awareness (TIA) office.
be noted that the Homegrown Terrorism Act was originally voted down, but
was later dissected and then still implemented into US law through other various pieces of
these acts and agencies have established the foundation and cornerstone for the War On Terror.
The dawn of a new
century, and the
millennium, did not start well, and only became worse under the new post-9/11
US would make a bold departure from the protection of human rights, to a blatant
disregard for them. An ironic dichotomy was presented to Americans, the US would
have to curtail Constitutional rights in order to protect their freedom.
Secondly, the US would now start wars in order to prevent them.
Time to cue Auntie Em... "Dorothy? Dorothy, wake up."
The War On Terror
So what is a war on
The term itself is as
nebulous and vague as one could possibly imagine. There is no clearly
defined enemy. There is no specifically identified threat. The term is limited
to nothing more than just "terror." This in itself is an irony
since the phrase lends its meaning to an open-ended war.
4 : violent or destructive acts (as bombing)
committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into
granting their demands <insurrection and revolutionary
wholly expected the first definition of "fear," but the 2nd, 3rd and 4th
definitions were somewhat suspicious to me.
Having a communications background, I suspected a manipulation of this definition, so I
turned to my broadcast school issued Random House college edition, copyright
1975. As I thought, a contemporary spin had been placed on the current
definition, one that had never existed before. The newer updated definition described
above seemed to be tailored to play to
the Bush-Cheney theme of terror.
was that old saying from Churchill again?
According to the 1975 Random House version, the pre-9/11 definition of terror is:
1. intense, sharp overmastering fear: to be
frantic with terror.
2. a feeling, instance, or cause of intense fear: to
be a terror to evildoers. to frighten.
alarm, dismay, consternation. Terror, Horror, Panic, Fright, all imply extreme
fear in the presence of danger or evil. Terror implies an intense fear that is
somewhat prolonged and may refer to imagined or future dangers: frozen with
terror. Horror implies a sense of shock at a danger that is also evil: to
recoil in horror. Panic and Fright both imply a sudden shock of fear. Panic is
uncontrolled and unreasoning fear, often groundless, that may be prolonged:
The mob was in a panic. Fright is usually of short duration.
there you have it, the pre-9/11 definition of terror. I think it's safe to say
that Karl Rove was also using this older standard version when they dreamt up the
according to Random House, we could have had the war on horror, or the
war on fright. We could even have gone so far as to have the war on evil,
or the war on bad.
think you get my point.
gist to all of this is, none of these vague descriptors defines a specific enemy, nor
identifies a particular threat, as
wars used to.
all understood the war against Nazis. That was an identified enemy to be feared, but
the term terror defines no one. I would proffer that this was done by
design, with explicit and calculated intent, because this gives the powers
behind our government, and the military industrial complex, an open-ended ticket
to never ending war.
you don't define the enemy, how do you place a measurement for victory in the war?
you ever spent the 5th grade intellect to answer the question, when will terror
be defeated?How can anyone ever say for sure that terror or evil has been
for that second coming of Jesus, who out there stands a chance to banish all
evil from the earth, especially when those running the show are the biggest
terrorists of all?
Fighting a war on terror is the same as the church saying it's going to end lust,
or that we're going to stop politicians from lying, or cure bankers of greed.
The truth is... the War On Terror is
a metaphor. Period. Plain and simple. Nothing more and nothing less.
The War On Terror is right up
there with the war on hunger, the war on poverty, the war on illiteracy, or even
the war on drugs.
Those are all metaphors.
Understand that basic, core premise. It is an analogy. None of those are
physical combat "wars," as we historically know them.
We are not actually waging a physical
"war" on any of these things, using life threatening conventional warfare
tactics and armament
Again... undeniably... all
We've been addressing those issues
for quite some time now; a very long time.
So how are those issues working out
for you so far?
Ending the War On Terror is like
trying to stop dogs from chasing cats, or getting men to quit ogling at women.
gonna happen folks.
Terrorism, like crime, is a direct
byproduct of a socio-economic environmental habitant. It is the direct blowback from government
meddling in foreign affairs, such as stealing a country's resources, oppressing its
people, or both.
The only way we will stop terrorism
is when we quit economic and capitalist terrorism. The day we quit raping
and pillaging other countries for their natural resources, when we end unlawful
occupation of foreign lands, only then will we start to see an end to foreign
As for domestic state sponsored
terrorism, now that's an entirely different issue.
highlight in the Random House definition of terror is the use of Bush's favorite
the record, can there be a more intellectually deficient phrase than evildoers?
Evildoers has to be right up there with the term boogeyman, yet somehow it found
a prominent place in the propaganda spin for the War On Terror.
one else in the Bush administration ever used the term evildoers. Not
Cheney, not Rumsfeld, not Condoleeza Rice... no one. That word seemed to be
reserved exclusively for Bush, to scare old women and young children with. It
was as much a part of his fractured vocabulary as nuke-ler, or
hard to imagine that Bush could ever keep a straight face while using this
phrase exclusively for himself, over and over, repeatedly. He used it with a
term itself is hysterically laughable, if it wasn't for the fact that it was
pathetically exploited over and over and over again. We were clearly rubed on
that one folks.
Fear is a powerful control tool,
which is exactly why we have this lame War On Terror in the first place. The
powers that be, along with our
leaders and politicians, know exactly what they are doing. They want us to be
full of fear. They want us to look to them for protection.
Fear is easily the number one
control mechanism in the world, right next to bribery. It moves people like no other force known
to man. It's an inherent inbred emotion. Fear provokes involuntary reaction.
FDR once said that the only thing we
have to fear is fear itself. That sounds good from a speaker's lectern or a
pulpit, but the reality is, human beings are fragile and do not like pain or
confinement. The threat of assault, physical violence, or incarceration is the
intimidation we get from fear. It is a natural and unapologetic human trait that
is seemingly uncontrollable.
Fear is power.
The Real Terrorists
It's an indisputable fact that Bush,
Cheney and the Republican party terrorized us more than anyone else. The term
terror became an hourly mantra for them. Their Homeland Security fear
thermometer was nothing more than a mechanism for them to dial up fear with. It
was already admitted that they used their terror scale for their own advantage,
such as before key elections, to manipulate public emotion. Remember the
warnings that Darth Cheney would issue? If you vote for candidate B, we will get
How many times did we hear that
threat from Cheney?
Correct answer: too many.
And don't think the Democrats and
Obama get a pass either. They've had three years to undo the constitutional
atrocities and legislative horrors of the Bush-Cheney regime, but "hope"
was apparently just a campaign slogan for them, and the only "change" we
got was the little that we have left in our pockets after the Wall Street and
Federal Reserve fleecing of America.
A war on terror? How about a war on predatory
mortgage fraud, political corruption, or Wall Street and Capitol Hill insider
Face it folks. The War On Terror is a
It has all been one gigantic
treasonous lie right from the start. Those that buy into this
uneducated, ignorant, or just plain stupid.
First off Osama bin Laden was never
wanted by the FBI for 9/11. They had no evidence to link him to the crime. That
is a fact.
Secondly, the Taliban were more than
willing to hand bin Laden over in a minute, if we could provide the intelligence
proof that he was involved. We offered no proof because we had none.
Third, Osama was a CIA trained asset.
He was known to his CIA handlers as Tim Osman. The CIA actually visited him in
the hospital in Dubai just before 9/11, when he was suffering from kidney
disease. If he was wanted so badly for the Cole bombing and the US barracks
bombing in Africa, how come he wasn't arrested at that time?
The answer is, because the black hats
at the CIA needed him to be Lee Harvey bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks. He was
the chosen patsy for the great Muslin terror fraud.
Even though he was captured and
killed after the Tora Bora raids, they kept the specter of Osama alive to keep
the fear with the public alive and well.
The War On Terror is as bogus as Dick
Cheney having a soul.
We invent new enemies for our fake
terror war as quickly as we need them.
The Al Qaeda threat is another CIA
manifestation, created by them in the
1980's to help fight the Russians in Afghanistan. This is where Tim Osman, AKA
Osama bin Laden, got his start. The term Al Qaeda simply referred to a database
of CIA trained operatives.
Much of the world has caught on to
the al Qaeda ruse, so now we have the emergence of another CIA-backed
organization, ISIS. Another boogeyman to scare the people with.
We didn't attack Afghanistan because
the Taliban wouldn't turn Osama over. We did it for imperial capitalist
One of the first things that Bush and Cheney did after stealing
office was to invite the Taliban to the US to discuss an
oil and gas
pipeline route across Afghanistan to the Caspian sea. The Taliban said no
deal, angering the new PNAC-led Bush administration.
That is just one reason why
the Taliban became enemies of the Bush-Cheney administration, and the powers
behind it. There are other reasons as well.
Profit As An Incentive
Along with an oil and gas route, it also doesn't hurt that the world's
foremost supply of Lithium is located in Afghanistan. Lithium is needed for
today's highly lucrative, growing world of rechargeable batteries.
On top of all that, you have arguably
the world's largest supply of poppies, needed for the also very lucrative opium
In Iraq, the US and UK have looted
antiquities, stolen the nation's oil supply, as well as all of their gold
In Libya, a new oil ministry and also
a central bank were put in place before Gaddafi was even toppled.
How is that even possible?
So make no mistake about it,
pillaging and thievery is still a hallmark of war.
It's all about increasing power, and
more money is always a huge boost to that goal.
Lies And More Lies
Other examples of blatant lying in
the fabricated War On Terror are... 1) the false Iraq-9/11 connection,
and 2) the blatant
weapons of mass destruction war lie.
Neither account was true.
Both Bush and Cheney have admitted
this publicly on record, but they also both denyever making the charges to
They seem to forget there are
numerous recorded news accounts. This either attests to how stupid that they
think we are, or how pathetically stupid they are.
So for the record, we
invaded Afghanistan, and Iraq under heir Bush, with no provocation whatsoever.
The US attacked
two innocent countries under Bush-Cheney, killed over a million people, 90% of which were civilian, and
overthrew their respective governments and executed their political leaders. (Assassinated
or murdered are probably the more accurate terms.)
Bush-Cheney administration may have started the War On Terror, the Obama
administration certainly furthered it. Obama has continued the Bush policies
while adding some of his own.
He has failed
in his promise to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center, to end the use of torture,
and to end the wars and bring our troops home. So far, he has bowed to the
"powers that be" (or shouldn't be), continuing to wage US led terror
around the world, by invading a third innocent
country since 9/11 with an unprovoked invasion of Libya.
The Obama administration
claims Gaddafi was a brutal dictator, even when the United Nations was scheduled
to give him a human rights award. So much for being a tyrant.
Libya was a
shining star of civilization in North Africa with a standard of living exceeding
many nations, with perks given to its citizens that none in the US has ever
enjoyed, save for the filthy rich. The people of Libya were happy and well taken
care of. They shared in the oil wealth of Libya, and as a result, appeared to
love Gaddafi for making it happen.
Gaddafi fell out of favor
with the west only after he told
the powers that be in the Rothschild-Rockefeller central banking cartel that
Libya and the emerging African union would no longer accept Federal Reserve
For the record, the sanctioning of the illegal Libya
invasion and Gaddafi murder came from a guy who was given the Nobel Peace Prize
upon entering office. Obama's actions will forever taint the history of this
once prestigious award.
It should also be noted that Saddam,
like Gaddafi, had said no more to the US dollar. Both were moving their
economies from the Federal Reserve Note (the banking cartel) to the gold dinar.
At least, so they thought.
invaded since 9/11 with no moral justification whatsoever, with millions killed
in the process. I would tend to think that this arguably makes us the number one
terrorist state in the world right now, with the black hats at the CIA running
neck and neck with MI5, MI6 and the Mossad as the top terror organizations.
Parse the facts any way
you like, but the world as a whole sees the US (and UK) in a much different
Not to be outdone by
Bush, Obama also began bombing in Syria, his second country of unprovoked attack
during his administration, and the fourth country for the US since 9/11.
To be fair, the US and
UK are involved in Somalia and the Sudan as well, with even more targets on the
according to retired General Wesley Clark. who said seven wars were planned
right after 9/11. (Much evidence points to pre-9/11 war planning.)
Again, we fought WWII to keep the Nazis from
taking over our country, yet we invade others without a second thought.
The US has over 700 bases around the
world. The US calls it protection, but smaller countries simply call it
forced occupation, or political intimidation.
If those 700+ bases all flew a Nazi
flag, those in the US might see it as others do.
What has the US become as a nation?
What have the corrupt powers that
be turned a once great country into?
We do not fight a war on terror. We
are fighting a war of terror, a war for terror.
An Agenda Of War
How far will the Syria attacks go?
Who will be next in line for
unprovoked attack? How about Pakistan? Will it be
It would appear that thepowers that be who
control the US military juggernaut have their sights set on all of the above. The
only thing needed now is to label each country as a terrorist state, (or a
sponsor of terrorism) and then it's off to
All they need to do is conjure up
some cockeyed story, like yellow-cake uranium from Niger, or maybe weapons of
mass destruction. The corporate owned media machine will gutlessly do its part
to pour it all in a bowl and then set it out on the front porch for the brain dead
non-thinkers to hungrily lap up.
"Mmmm," they will say,
"more terror soup."
Disinformation can be somewhat
filling when served to an empty vacuous brain.
It's all absolute, purely insane,
outright madness. There's no other way to look at it.
For those that do think...
have you ever noticed how all of the so-called terrorist states are the ones
that are saying no to the new world order? It's funny how the Axis of Evil were
those countries not within the Rothschild central bank orbit.
Saddam said no more Federal Reserve
notes for Iraq. Boom!
Gaddafi said no more Federal Reserve
notes for Libya. Boom!
For crying out loud, if you can't
figure out this bullshit War On Terror by now, well... you probably watch
too much TV news.
Essentially what it comes down to is
this... the War on Terror is a war against those who stand in opposition to the
banking cartel and their plans for a new world order.
It's really as simple as that.
Oh sure, there are vast profits to be
made along the way for those ultra-rich with no soul or moral values, but
for the most part, the War on Terror is a final push for the new world order.
Since 9/11, the US has
helped the globalist agenda by following the PNAC's imperialist blueprint to the
very letter of the document, fulfilling their
plan for US domination, and thus creating a world of mayhem that is literally ready to
come apart at the seams any moment now.
This false War On
Terror only creates terror. It does not stop it - and there is proof.
NSA has even admitted as much publicly, back in 2006, but surprisingly (or not
surprisingly) not much has been made of it to date by the corporate-owned US
The following graph
shows you the course of terrorism from 1970 to present.
Source: The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and
Responses to Terrorism (START) Global Terrorism Database
As you can see from the chart above, just like US violent crime,
global terrorism was declining dramatically, before the War On Terror,
but has now skyrocketed since then.
How anyone can support the
post-9/11 actions of the US (and the UK) is quite hard to understand. Some still vainly
cling to the old romantic notion that the land of the free and the brave is
fighting these nondescript evildoers in order to make us all safe. Some
naively believe that we're simply doing "God's work." (I'm sure
he's quite proud.)
refuse to see what's in front of their face, nor entertain that we would ever
stoop so low, to such brutal barbarity. It's very much like refusing to accept
that maybe their favorite uncle Sam has a drinking problem, or an anger
faith, should never be blind. It is reasoned, informed and it is educated. Being
a good patriot also comes from questioning your government and holding it
accountable for its actions. We need more Americans questioning the actions
of a government gone wild.
you ask this author, the term neocon is to be feared more than evildoers. It is
a name that is very much synonymous with Nazi. (My apologies to the Nazis.) Both groups are extremely far right and
both are advocates for fascism, government run by the corporate elite and the uber-wealthy.
The real power behind
the fake War On Terror is the ultra-wealthy banking cartel that pays off our
politicians, rigs our elections, controls our intelligence agencies and the
military industrial complex. This core banking cartel of multi-billionaires and
unreported trillionaires has unlimited access to funding with which to initiate
foreign coup d' etats, assassinate political leaders, pay judges, and buy into and
control our corporate media. The age old adage that money is power is one of the
great truisms of this world, one that this cabal of the immoral filthy rich uses
most deviously to
The goal is to do away with
nation status and form a one-world currency for a one-world order that is
ruled by them. It has been a diabolically patient plan, carried out in secret over many
decades, but since the new millennium and 9/11, they are very close to their
long planned goal, thanks in large part to their vague, open-ended false War On
It's uncomfortable to
admit, but if you do your homework, as John and Robert Kennedy both did, you'll
learn that these heavily moneyed powers that be, and the dark secret
societies that they belong to, have all the funding and power at their disposal
to pull this final coup off. It's no accident that we received the PNAC vision of a new Pearl
Harbor, and it's no coincidence that America has taken the lead role in the new
wars of terror.
A sinister agenda is at
work in the world right now. Our only hope is that the white hats of our
intelligence agencies, and the remaining honorable officers of our military will rise up
to finally put an end to this reign of terror. If not, then the second coming
of Jesus is our only hope left. If that sounds bleak, it's because it is.
A multi-billion dollar war industry has been
put in place in the US since WWII, but now we also have a new
security and defense infrastructure since 9/11. This
has created an enormous three-pronged military monster, a
three-headed hydra, which voraciously devours US defense
The military industrial complex
(MIC) within the US has always been entangled with the large
private industry contractors, but a new component has been
created, of a vast "security" industry. This military
industrial complex triad involves the following...
MIC: DOD, NRO, NSA, CIA, FBI, DARPA, etc.
Contractors: Raytheon, Lockheed, Northrup Gruman, etc.
Security: G4S, Academi, DynaCorp, KBR, etc
Trillions pour through the coffers of these
hungry defense giants like water through a sieve. After all, the
MIC is number two on the list of most profitable industries on
the face of the earth, and that's a huge problem for the rest of
humanity that does not have a vested interest in those profits.
Military Industrial Complex
And so the question we all need to demand an
answer for is, when will it all stop?
When will this two decade senseless war
When will the War on Terror finally be over?
When will it be safe?
When will the US and UK militaries officially
wipe out "terror" in the world? (Yeah, good luck with
When will this bullshit, overblown War on
Terror finally come to an end?
As Nostradamus once
predicted centuries ago, "The antichrist very soon annihilates the three,
twenty-seven years his war will last."
Let's hope that he wasn't
referring to the Kennedy's, John, Robert, and John Jr. It was after the death of the third Kennedy
that this War On Terror began.
We're already 13 years into
what this author refers to as the "vague wars." Another
14 years of this bogus War On Terror would be hard to bear.
If you take anything
away from this article, let it be that the War On Terror is bullshit.
Sinking of the Maine
- (leading to the Spanish-American war) The Maine exploded in Havana Harbor and
was blamed on a Spanish mine, but it was later determined that the cause was the
ignition of five tons of powder used for the ship's massive six and ten inch
guns. Many have suggested that since the Maine was already obsolete upon its
initial launch, it was used as the excuse for a war with Spain.
Sinking of the Lusitania
– (leading to World War I) The US is said to have secretly
leaked information to the Germans that the Lusitania was
carrying a secret cargo of weapons. This of course obviously
did not sit well with Germany. A German U-boat was
consequently ordered to sink the ship ocean liner, giving
the US the excuse to enter into World War I.
– (leading to World War II) Some claim this as the first
ever sacrifice with full knowledge of an impending enemy
attack. This horrific 9/11-type event was said to be
used by those wanting U.S. war involvement, to form
and then galvanize U.S. opinion into backing involvement in
World War II.
to Admiral Kimmel, the US had broken the Japanese codes and
knew well in advance exactly when and where the attack would
begin. The US moved key ships out to sea and is said to have
allowed the attacks to take place, justifying its war
presence and the eventual use of nuclear weapons which
resulted in a long-sought place of world military prominence
for the U.S.
– (expanding US involvement in the Viet Nam War) The US
claimed that the North Vietnamese launched torpedoes at the
destroyer Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin. Former Secretary of
Defense Robert McNamara later admitted that the attack had
never happened. Essentially, the LBJ expansion of U.S.,
involvement in the Viet Nam War was based on a lie. Millions
died in the decade long war as a result of this now admitted
Invasion – (leading to the first Iraq War) The US told
Saddam it was okay to take over Kuwait and seize their oil
fields. We even sold them the poison gas to attack Kuwait
with. The Kuwaiti Ambassador’s daughter in Washington
falsely posed as an Iraqi nurse, claiming babies were taken
from incubators and left to die on the cold floor. Nothing
of the sort ever happened. It was a lie to stir Americans to
anger. She was said to be coached by DC ad firm, Hill &
Knowlton. After Saddam attacked Kuwait, the US then
double-crossed him and went ahead and attacked Iraq.
Ethnic Cleansing - (leading to Kosovo war)
Rade Markovic, former head of
the Department of State Security of the Serbian Ministry of the Interior (the
Serbian Secret Service) testified that he was tortured to lie and say that
Slobodan Milosevic murdered ethnic Albanians and tried to drive them from
Kosovo. The US went to war under false pretenses once again. In the end it was
all about establishing an economic trade corridor for corporate interests.
The 9/11 Attacks (leading to the War On Terror) -
A small, very far right, group of extremist
individuals, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) believed that America
was at the height of its power and that
it needed to assert itself in the world and take control while we are the lone
a September 2000 PNAC manifesto titled, "Rebuilding
America's Defenses," doubt was cast as to how fast
these aims could be achieved by a right-wing administration,
however, it was noted that the presence of a "new Pearl
Harbor" would help the public to go along with their
plan for imperialism and power.
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent
some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl
coincidence would have it, one year from that printing, and
less than one year after this select group of PNAC
individuals were placed into offices of high power within
the Bush-Cheney administration, they conveniently received
their new Pearl Harbor on September the 11th, 2001
with the 9/11
attacks. The gateway of opportunity for their brazen
plan for US domination was suddenly now open for
If you're not living in fear of terror, are
you truly a good patriotic American?
A Couple Of Prescient Scenes From Star Wars
The parallel here to the 9/11
ruse and the Bush-Cheney War On Terror is right on.
The beginning of tyranny and the
Clone Wars. (This scene was cut from the movie.)
The Death Star
College Humor hits this one out of the park. Spot
parody. Awesome satire.
Military Industrial Complex
About The Author:
Tim Watts is a veteran San Francisco
broadcaster with 25 years experience in the industry as
an on-air talent, Program Director, and national consultant. He
is the creator and sole author of the websites
TheAmericanTruthNetwork.com. He is also host of the
Mad As Hell Radio Show. He has been
writing about U.S. corruption over the last decade, while also investigating 9/11 from the moment that the first tower
fell. He has documented his detailed 9/11 research on a website
A September Coup.