High-Crimes Are Protected With One Simple Phrase
The Truth About "Conspiracy
Theory" How One Simple
Phrase Is Pushed Upon Us, Over And Over Again... Just Like
Brainwashing NewsFocus, by
Tim Watts - 013110
The Societal Brainwash Trigger That Tells Us All
To Look Away
can generally be said about conspiracy theories, there are two sides of unequal
education debating the investigation of choice, with the "uneducated side" resisting
relevant new information because it’s contrary to what they believe.
The question to
the outsider, which group is which?
"uneducated side" is essentially those who are unwilling to look
at all of the information. These people have seldom ever
attempted the exhaustive years of
research to get the full grasp of the story, instead spending
few weeks or months at best, to find shaky evidence or
questionable testimony to support and prop up their own preconception
of the issue. Those who have diligently researched the issue know both sides of the
coin, while the debunker with less research knows only one side.
like it when their perception of the world is challenged. This
true for all of the major political conspiracies of our day. Pick
any name, whether it’s John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy,
Martin Luther King, John F. Kennedy Jr., Paul Wellstone, Mel
Carnahan… or pick any event, ranging from the first World
Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City Murrah building
explosions, to the 9/11 World Trade Center demolition, there are
two sides of argument, no matter the conspiracy.
have formed personal mental firewalls when it comes to conspiracy, due to learned
behavior from the media, but many also deny the large conspiracy
because it's too hard to fathom. They falsely assume that the
"epic crime" is simply too impossible to happen.
"constants of ignorance" will remain until both sides
in the conspiracy debate are, A) of equivalent knowledge
regarding the issue, and B) open to accepting new information,
even though it is paradigm changing to their initial stance on
Facts Define Reality
have never met an intelligent person who, after looking into the
evidence of the John F. Kennedy assassination, ever came away
believing that a lone gunman from a far away book depository
fired off consecutive accurate shots from a bolt-action
carbine rifle. The reason they don't believe it is because they
are aware of suppressed facts that are out there, hidden
information that few take the time to look for, evidence that
paints a much different picture than the official story.
The same is true
of 9/11. This author most certainly did not knowingly charge into nine years of
investigation and research thinking that small unscrupulous
factions of our government were involved in any way. To the
contrary, this research effort was initiated in the hopes of
foreign operatives took the WTC towers down. Due to the
nature of their collapse it was apparent that something else
other than airplanes compromised those buildings to the point
that they, A) fell at free fall speed with no resistance, while
following the path of greatest resistance through their own
structural core, and B)
each fell conveniently into their own footprint.
To go into this
research thinking that terrorists were solely responsible, and
then find facts and evidence that suggest another explanation,
has been very hard
to deal with. It has been that way for every investigator who
has taken on the task of finding the real truth from that
horrible September day. Not many were expecting what they found.
indeed truly blissful, but once Pandora's box has been opened,
it's hard to return to the innocence of naiveté.
The Epiphany Moment
When you meet
evidence that you don't expect to find, evidence that steers
your conclusion in a different direction, you either accept it
or you don't. Those that refuse the new direction generally
reject it out of hand as the result of bad research and cockeyed
conspiracy theory, or they just simply don't want to accept the
ramifications, but for those willing to look at the evidence
in a new light, an epiphany is rendered.
To reach an epiphany,
you need perception altering information that is contrary to your
previous knowledge. When it happens, this is for all intents and
purposes, the game changer; the redefining Eureka moment. With
the 9/11 event, you will only reach this point after you have
fully examined all of the information and the evidence, with an open
easily dismiss critical information or evidence out of hand as
coincidence or irrelevance are not looking for the truth. These
people are not willing to spend years delving into every facet,
every single nuance of the crime. They would rather look only at
facts that support their own perceptions, rather than looking at
all of the evidence.
There are two
types of debunker, those who are earnestly working to cover the
crime up and those who simply don't like the conclusions that
are coming from those investigating the crime. Usually it is the
government linked conspiracies that drive many debunkers,
generally because they are unwilling to accept that their
government would ever harm civilians, nor attempt cover-ups of
The second debunker is
usually involved, not out of a passion for investigating the
crime, but because of a passion of "offense,"
stirred up by those who investigate the crime. The debunker
seldom enters a conspiracy discussion to find the truth, but
rather to vent their disgust over a concept they cannot deal
with. They usually get involved only
because they don't like what they hear coming from the
investigators, hypotheses that are too heretical to their belief
system and much too inconceivable for them to fathom.
To Conspiracy Theory Debunkers
For those that
would debunk, please accept this test as a challenge of your
give the dictionary definition of “conspiracy.”
how this does not pertain to factions within
this word is not legitimate in describing
explain why, after "conspiracy theory" has been cried, the legitimacy of a crime is
suddenly tagged as improbable or
impossible, and thus the allegation is instantly negated out of
the individuals involved in the following real life instances were
not involved in a conspiracy and how conspiracy theory would
have been an
inappropriate assessment of their meticulously organized plot.
Remember, these were once just "conspiracies," until they
were proven to be real.
4) 1934 coup
5) The Gulf of
really so hard to
fathom a conspiracy when addressing large scale criminal
ambitions of the
Since when did believability circumvent
probability in a real investigation?
And why is a
conspiracy out of the question once government
connections start to get made?
Conspiracies Do Happen
There is obviously no substantial
conspiracy theory in, say, shoplifting, but why then is that
also assumed when it comes to much larger “inconceivable
crimes.” The notion is okay to entertain for a movie, but yet
too unbelievable for real life? This might be true, until
you realize the depths that mankind is capable of stooping to
for vast unimaginable riches and unlimited power. And the fact
that people believe the way they do regarding conspiracies makes it
all that much easier to pull
off a monolithic plan of grandiose scale.
Don't be fooled. If the
is there, no crime can ever be discounted as too unbelievable.
To think that
any crime is impossible or unbelievable has the effect of creating
an environment for the “perfect crime,” a
criminal act of such huge proportions that no one would believe
it, nor bother to investigate it. Armed with this concept, if you
have lots of money and no scruples, the larger the crime,
the easier it is to pull it off and blame it on something or
A suspected conspiracy plot is by itself a theory, until
it is proven correct. Thus there is no necessary
English grammatical usage requirement for creating a redundant
term by saying “conspiracy theory,” unless of course you wanted
to create a term with a negative image.
A Weak Argument
term “conspiracy theory” is the premise from which debunkers
wish to base their attack, then one should be able to reasonably
assume that they also think all
criminal cases with suspects temporarily behind bars due to
circumstantial evidence are “conspiracy
theories” as well, because their cases have yet to be proven.
To cry “conspiracy theory”
when it pertains to very serious criminal
activity is intellectually deficient and wholly disingenuous as
an argument. To make such a claim, it is reasonable to assume that those
making the allegation have: A) something to hide, or B) ignorance to
When you scream
conspiracy theory, you
are sure to get shut out of the debate right from the start, because your allegation
is insulting to the voluminous research already collected, let
alone the countless hours, months, and years of research that
the debunkers themselves have not yet taken the effort for.
Conspiracy theory is
cried most when people find it hard to accept the real truth,
or when someone has something to hide.
has conspiracy theory been used as much as it has for 9/11.
Irrefutable 9/11 Evidence
Three buildings conveniently
collapsed into their own footprint, in less than :10
seconds each with little or no resistance, while traveling the
path of most resistance, through their massive steel
and concrete cores.
to Department of Transportation chief Norm Mineta, Cheney
watched the plane coming into the Pentagon from well over 50
miles out, yet did not have the plane shot down, when he
easily could have.
jet engine was found in New York that is not from a 757.
and wheel assembly were found in the Pentagon, not from a 757.
grade thermite (thermate) was found in four separate
dust samples from the WTC destruction.
9/11 hijackers are still alive to this day and were not
involved in the September 11, 2001 attacks.
FEMA showed up
the night before 9/11, as testified by Ray Kenney.
Norman Mineta testified that Dick Cheney was tracking the
attacking Pentagon object from over 80 miles out.
Tenable 9/11 Observations & Questions
Impossible for buildings to fall that fast,
unless controlled demo.
and office furniture are incapable of creating temps to melt
or soften steel. Yet we had rivers of molten steel for nearly two
months after 9/11, even after being doused repeatedly with
affected the lower floors of either WTC 1 or 2.
Not one, but
steel frame high rise buildings free-fell within seconds into their own
footprints, for the first time ever in history.
of the Pentagon were breached.
for a hollow aluminum plane to fly through three rings of solid
steel reinforced concrete at the the Pentagon. Did a
No wing impact marks on the face of the
No large plane parts found at Pentagon or
Debris field scattered in Pennsylvania over
six to eight miles.
Fourcoincidental terrorist war games
scheduled on the same day.
NORAD defeated three times. (assuming
they took out flight 93)
DC emergency dispatch tapes and video are
The emergency fuel tanks were never reported
to blow at WTC 7.
Damning 9/11 Circumstantial Evidence To Consider
Bush sat in classroom and was derelict of duty as Commander in
Chief while we
were under attack. He gave no orders to Chief of Staff
Andrew Card. Bush said and did absolutely nothing. The
leader of the free world has just been told that for the first time
since our nation’s independence, the mainland of the United
States of America is under attack, yet he just sat there. He even did
a short photo-op with the teacher afterwards, so he was clearly in no
hurry whatsoever to see if we were being attacked anywhere
else, like maybe Chicago or Los Angeles, or perhaps even Washington
Rumsfeld left his post and was derelict of duty, going instead
outside to the Pentagon lawn for a staged photo op that
would conveniently establish his reason for being away from the
war room, rather than directing an effective defense of the
nation as were his express duties. In light of the military
personnel there, the single presence of Donald Rumsfeld on the
Pentagon lawn helping with a stretcher did not add to the rescue
effort, however his detraction from the chain of command was an
egregious breach of command and military protocol which impeded the
proper defense of the country during a direct attack.
Dick Cheney was in the war room of the Presidential Emergency
Operations Center (PEOC) bunker beneath the White House. DOT
Secretary Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission
that Cheney tracked the Pentagon attack plane from well over 80
miles out, before it had struck. Even with 1960's missile
technology we could have blown that plane (missile) out of the
air easily, but Cheney didn’t. When pressed by a young man as to
whether the orders still stand, Cheney became visibly
angry and whipped his neck around declaring, “Of course the
orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
It wasn't too long after that the Pentagon was hit.
Former CIA head George HW Bush was in town and stayed in the
White House the night before 9/11 and was in Washington DC the
following morning. With "W" sitting in an elementary school
classroom in Florida, Cheney in the PEOC and Rumsfeld on the
Pentagon lawn, who was flying in the E4B seen over Washington?
Was this the airplane that HW stepped onto that morning in DC,
rather than a commercial airliner? Who else would have had
The Reality of Conspiracy
For someone to
purposefully try and dissuade a line of thinking in a criminal
probe should raise questions as to the intent and
integrity of those making the effort to discount or derail those avenues of
investigation. People should think twice when someone cries
conspiracy theory. If there's nothing to hide, then what's the
harm in investigating?
nature for people to look out of curiosity even when someone
tells them not to look, but the one thing that seems to work
best at keeping
many from looking closer is two little words that we have been
conditioned to react adversely to, "conspiracy theory."
If the mere hint of conspiracy is mentioned, we're conditioned
by the media to believe that there is no merit to the story.
Get past the
deception. Conspiracy absolutely does happen in this world. As long as huge
money is available to unscrupulous men of greed, anything is possible. As
long as irrefutable power is sought by man, all theories must be
entertained to assess legitimate potential and likely
probability for the epic plot. To discount
legitimate possibilities out of hand because someone else deems
them to be inappropriate or too outlandish, plays only to the
advantage of those with something to hide.
Maybe the next
time someone yells "conspiracy theory" we should turn and
for once, rather than follow our conditioned response of turning
The truth is,
conspiracy theory generally comes from the government, whether
it be a lone gunman with a slow to fire bolt-action rifle from the far away
book depository, or three free falling skyscrapers collapsing in
ten seconds or less like a
controlled demolition, the official version is quite often the
hardest to swallow.
would appear that the official
story with it’s “magic bullet” or the hotter than normal
kerosene, is usually the one that tends to stretch all
credibility of the event, more so than those accounts deemed as actual
The next time
you hear someone claim it's all a conspiracy theory, think about
taking a second look and make sure you're not just creating the
environment for the perfect crime, by not looking at all.
As long as
mankind holds onto its insatiable greed and thirst for power,
the elements for criminal conspiracy are now, and will continue
to be, a given in our society.