Is This The "Change" That We Were Promised?
The International Bank Cartel Is Moving
Fast On Their New World Order
NewsFocus - Op-Ed by Tim Watts - 042011
Events are rapidly changing in the world around
us. Those that pay attention are seeing clear signs of a fervent push to bring
about the final pieces for the long planned and much feared New World Order. Only those
that are still
locked within "The Matrix" of a controlled media are without a clue. Those that
still get their news and information from the corporate controlled media have no idea what is
actually taking place, right in front of them. It's time for the overly
entertained lemmings of America to put down the remote control and step away
from their Dancing With The Stars and American Idol shows, and pay attention now,
before it's too late.
Is It Democracy On The Rise, Or Is This A Global
Agenda?
Have you ever questioned why all of a sudden that democracy is
on the rise in the Middle East? At least, that's what has been sold to us
regarding the faux
protests that have been orchestrated by outside factions.
During the Egyptian protests, while the western media did its best to propagate
the big lie about the source of the unrest, Al Jazeera was running interviews of
protestors, both anti and pro Mubarek, who all said that the uprising was
initiated by outside sources. The U.S. media failed to run those comments, even
though every major news organization gets a feed from Al Jazeera. They knew
about the claims. They just didn't want to run them because it went against the
grain of the official story.
The Palestinians alone have been fighting for years for a freedom
of their own, the return of their former homeland, but we don't wholly embrace
that call. Why
is that? Oh yeah, because the U.S. backs Israel, one of the biggest terrorist states
the world has ever known, right next to the CIA.
Well, how about Saudi Arabia then? Those people protested too, yet somehow
that wasn't hailed by Hillary and the U.S. as a "democracy uprising." Instead, brutal force
was used to suppress those protests, all coincidentally on March
11th, the day of the large Japan earthquake, when the world's eyes and its media
were elsewhere. Very convenient timing, but you can be sure it was no
coincidence.
So why weren't the Saudi Arabia protests considered "democracy on
the rise?" Why was their situation claimed to be different from the other
protests? Oh yeah, because the Saudis are our big oil buddies, and as with Israel, we
only support "our American interests."
Hillary Clinton just loves to pontificate about how the people in
North Africa and the Middle East all suddenly want
democracy, until it affects our interests. By interests, we mean "corporate
holdings" and U.S. economic needs.
Why is it that we feel we always have a right to another
country's resources?
General Smedley D. Butler was absolutely correct when he wrote that
"War Is A Racket," meant only to support the rich globalists and their
corporate holdings.
As a historical observation, protests do not necessarily spread like
wild fire, contrary to what we've been
told and sold. These alleged "uprisings" were all fomented from outside sources, by
factions within the western intelligence community, the
real
terrorists in this world; puppets of the ultra-wealthy international banking
cartel.
Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is also claiming that these faux uprisings are the work
of western powers.
"They are trying to foment discord in the region."
Ahmadinejad said in a speech carried by Press TV. "They
are seeking destruction and a reinforcement of their evil dominance in the
region."
Do a Google search for "Middle East protests map" and see how
hard the powers that be, through their media tools, are trying to sell us this false revolution. It seems
that everyone has a
map, so they can purportedly show you the alleged "revolution of democracy."
Such a transparent and cohesive effort. The corporate media minions
are all but falling all over themselves to sell us this false perception. They
have orchestrated their effort, so that wherever you turn for news, you are
literally forced to see this map.
North Africa and Middle East uprisings. (Source: CBC)
The people in Egypt did not suddenly look west to Tunisia and say
to themselves, "Hey,
that's a good idea. Let's revolt too." Those that buy into that false
assumption easily forget the number of protests that have gone on in the Middle
East for years, only to be quelled by U.S. installed / CIA backed governments.
So why no domino effect before this? Where was the sweeping wild
fire of democracy then?
To be fair, many of the protesters believe that they are
fighting for a new government, while others more knowledgeable are fighting to
prevent outside forces from taking over. Most however do not know about the
origins of these "Facebook revolutions." Nor do they realize that Facebook is a
CIA supported operation, much like Google and YouTube.
It is interesting to note that as word began to leak out
about the CIA-Facebook connection, there suddenly emerged a Hollywood propaganda
film to sell the myth of "The Social Network" to any who might have
doubts as to its true origin or purpose.
Once again, another timely and convenient component to prop up
the intelligence lie.
Has Democracy Truly Prevailed In These Protest
Nations?
The proof regarding the origin of these protests is in the end
result. Look at Egypt now. These people are still being oppressed, but this time by a
government that is willing to play ball with the new world order crowd.
First it was Algeria, then Tunisia, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Iran,
Libya, Morocco, Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain, the West Bank of Gaza, Yemen, and Syria. On
and on, yet the only thing accomplished was a new foothold for the international
banking cartel, along with their plans for a one world government, a new world order.
Democracy has not come to the people of these protest nations.
The only thing that has come of these alleged "uprisings" is more oppression. If
you doubt that, take a strong look at any of these nations. Egypt is essentially
now under a military rule.
In Bahrain there is no new democracy, but only bloodshed and
casualties.
In short, none of the areas that held uprisings has a new
government any better than the previous. The only thing different is that they
now have a propped up government with a solidified resolve to the international
banking order, whether they wanted it or not.
How strange was it to see the leaders of Tunisia and Egypt both
forced to step down, then suddenly both men have strokes that prevent them from
telling the real story? Both
Ben Ali and
Mubarak were alleged to have had severe strokes which placed both
deposed leaders into a comatose state, leaving each man incapable of reporting what really happened
to them.
Another weird coincidence and uncanny convenience for the powers
that be? Hardly.
Those that believe such a fabricated lie are just begging for a
swampland sale.
Time To Shackle The Jackal; The Unprovoked Attack On Libya
Perhaps most interesting of all is what
happens to a country whose leader does not back down to the powers that be, the
international banking cartel. As with Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak, Libyan
leader Moammar Gadhafi has found himself under intense pressure for not stepping
down.
Gaddafi has been a puppet for the powers that be for years, much
like Mubarak was, until he bucked a Middle East union. Many have alleged that
Gaddafi
was going to nationalize his oil, much the same way that Mosaddeq did in Iran
before being toppled by the CIA in 1953. Others purport that he was about to use
the oil money to provide free health care for his people. Whatever the
situation, one thing that he was talking about was the "powers that
be," those that wreak the real havoc in this world (the real terrorists). He
was also openly talking about the U.S.
factions behind the 9/11 event.
Gaddafi went before the United Nations and
accused them of being used by the powers that be through the UN Security
Council. He also appeared on U.S. television on CNN's Larry King,
talking about the hijackers being trained here in the United States. Once he
mentioned that, King immediately went to a commercial break. In short, he was telling a
tale that the U.S. and the international banking cartel did not want to be told.
For that indiscretion of truth, he is now paying the supreme price.
Truth Frequency News has done an excellent job of
exposing some of
the fraud being perpetrated in the
takeover of
Libya and the
conquest of the
Middle East, yet the corporate mainstream media has refused to follow up on
the keen investigative reporting of Chris Geo and on-air partner Sheree.
Probably more disturbing is the fact that even though the war is
still raging, without a CIA-backed rebel victory yet, somehow they were
able to replace the current national bank with a new central banking system, and
a
new head. This is most confusing, if not outright unbelievable.
So, with Gaddafi allegedly still in power,
they were able to cancel out his state run bank and implement a new bank, the
Central Bank of Libya, based in Benghazi, an institution that no doubt will play
along with the Rothschild's central banking cartel and the World Bank.
Again, how is an attacking force able to do this, with no
clear victory
or takeover of the country yet in hand?
Secondly, what does this mean for the
Federal Reserve's lending of $35-billion in low interest loans to Libya, and
how upset could we actually have been with Gaddafi if the Fed gave them that much of
our money to begin with? We won't even save our own private homeowners, yet the institution
that bankrupted our country recently gave an alleged foe a "low-interest"
$35-billion loan? That's the corrupt Federal Reserve at work, always
looking out for their interests and those of its mega-wealthy owners.
To top it all off, somehow, these mysterious behind the scene
factions that are driving the rebel insurgency were also able to take over the Libyan oil fields, and form a new
national oil company.
Amazing! How is anyone able to do this, without unseating
the current government?
All of this has been attributed to the
Interim Transitional National Council of the Libyan Republic, or so we are
led to believe. What powerful entities were able to pull off such a coup, with
Gaddafi still in in charge? I'll give you one guess. The criminal
international banking cartel that rules this world, along with its propped up
globalist henchman / leaders.
Quick note: why is it that the corporate media refuses to accept
one spelling for this guy's name? He's been in power for decades, and somehow we
cannot yet figure out how to spell his name... Gaddafi, Gadhafi, Qadhafi,
Qaddafi, Kadafi, Khadafy?
However you spell it, Gaddafi is now suddenly being touted as a
ruthless dictator, even though we were content to let him rule as he may for
years, all
the while doing much business with him, and extending him loans for tens of billions
of U.S. dollars.
The motive for the Libya
war is glaringly transparent, shutting Gaddafi up, while enacting a total takeover of the country by the
international banksters, with a new National
oil company and a new central bank as job one. Now that the banking cartel has
achieved its primary goal, they are debating whether ground troops are even
necessary now. Just so long as they control the fiat currency, the new modern
day enslavement of mankind.
The Globalist's Goal: A New Middle East Union
There are allegations of a
Middle East union in the works, much like the EU and the NAU, in preparation for
the international banker's long planned New World Order. It is hard to dismiss
such claims out of hand, when one views the incredible coordination of Middle
East uprisings taking place.
Again, ask yourself why we suddenly had to marshal our military
might and national monetary resources to leave Japan hanging, in order to go
after Libya, a regime that was not threatening anyone, but instead was
under attack from CIA-backed rebels? Libya wasn't going anywhere and posed no
threat to anyone, as opposed to Japan, which holds dire consequences for the
entire world.
So why haven't we committed these resources to
Darfur,
Sudan, where outrageous atrocities and genocide already face the people? How
about Somalia or Sri Lanka, or any other much more urgent crisis?
The answer is, it's all about money and the immoral international
bankers' own greed-based agenda. (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Morgans, etc.)
It is very telling to many when the western nations drop the most horrendous
disaster in modern time to go fight an unprovoked war for capitalism. Why would
these countries opt out of doing everything in their power to avert the Japan
meltdown catastrophe, only instead to run off and inflict more harm on another nation
and its people?
Once again, Libya
was threatening no one. Only the central banks had an interest in Libya, as
evidenced by the immediate new institutions put in place there, before the war was even
over, a new central bank and a new national oil company.
As the old saying goes,
the proof is in the pudding.
The True Terrorists Behind The Evil In This World
It's funny how the nations that we wish to conquer and
"democratize" are not part of the international banking cartel. The purported
"Axis of Evil" states, labeled by Bush, are all coincidentally not part of
the central banking system. What a coincidence.
The real evil exists with the mega-wealthy globalists, such as
the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, and the Morgans, etc. The secret societies
that President Kennedy
tried to
warn us about, before he was brutally murdered in the streets of Dallas'
Dealy Plaza. These hidden entities are pure evil, and should be considered by all as treasonous, to
not only the U.S. and its guiding Constitution, but also the citizens of the
world.
Consider this gem from the patriarch of the Rothschilds:
"Let me
issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the
laws."
-Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) Founder of the House of
Rothschild.
Or how about this very damning letter,
again, from the Rothchilds,
which details the plan for a new central banking system in
the United States (the Federal Reserve):
"The few who understand the system will either be so interested in
its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be
no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great
body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous
advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its
burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting
that the system is inimical to their interests."
-The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New
York, 1863.
Perversely wealthy individuals such as this have no God, except for
money. Many actually worship Lucifer himself. They
practice occult teachings with the misguided notion that it is the true power
within our universe. They use symbology and
occult numerology in their evil plans. Events such as December 7th, 9/11 and
7/7 have hidden meaning for only them. Even the recent Japan earthquake, alleged
by many to be the result of secret eco-weaponry, was also on 3/11. And as if
that isn't enough for you, ask yourself if it truly is just a weird coincidence
that we brutally attacked the nations of Iraq and Libya, both on the date 3/19.
(March
19, 2003 Iraq Shock & Awe,
March 19, 2011 Libya attack) The March 19th date leads up to the occult
spring equinox and also the Illuminati feast of human sacrifice on March 21st
and 22nd.
The "Shock & Awe" debacle was also appropriately named because
that was a calculated message that was being sent to the rest of the world. We
named it so because that's the condition that we wanted from anyone who would
challenge the U.S.
Bush was never interested in investigating the worst domestic
attack ever on U.S. soil. Instead, we concocted the Osama lie, even though he
immediately denied any 9/11 involvement, just as we invented the
CIA-organized Al Qaeda organization,
all to prevent the Russians from capturing the valued supply lines and
invaluable resources of Afghanistan.
Osama himself was a CIA asset, right up to 9/11. This fact was
echoed by former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, who was gagged by the Bush
administration and prevented from telling her story publicly for nearly eight
years. CIA officials even visited Osama just two weeks before 9/11 in his
hospital room in Dubai, as he was stricken with kidney disease and impending
failure. He was wanted at the time for the Cole bombing and the US barracks bombing, but no
one ever arrested him.
Like the fictitious KAOS of "Get Smart" TV fame, we
perpetrated and propagated the Al Qaeda myth to give the world an omnipresent
international organization to fear. As their ranks and hierarchy were quickly
diminished, we soon needed a greater, more formidable threat, which brings us
to the Muslim lie.
The Muslim Scapegoat: A New Manufactured Enemy
Most would be surprised to know the real truth behind the lie
regarding Muslims and the fictitious link to terrorism. It is not what Americans
have been brainwashed to believe, by a complicit corporate news media.
After the 9/11 lie,
the U.S. and the West needed a new enemy to scare the people with. (Fear is how
they control mindless TV/media lemmings.) Even though the U.S. government claims
that Saudi hijackers were to blame for the 9/11 attacks, we strangely enough never
attacked our oil ally and longtime Bush family partners, but went after
Afghanistan instead. This is perhaps not so odd when you understand that the
first meetings that George W. Bush had were with the Taliban, over an oil and gas
pipeline route,
conveniently enough, right through Afghanistan. The Taliban reportedly said no
deal. The rest, as they say, is history.
The first thing to understand is that Muslims are arguably the
most devout God fearing people on this earth. The Jews take a backseat to
Muslims when it comes to religious worship. Terrorism is not part of the
Muslim religion, although violence is practiced by the Jewish state of Israel on
a near daily basis.
The biggest key that the corporate media and disinformation
machine has not told you is that Muslims refuse to bow to the international
banking cartel. Muslims are not allowed to pay interest, and Muslim banks are
not allowed to charge interest. Are you starting to see the real issue here?
In the Rothschild's zeal to conquer the Middle East for their New
World Order, they must first topple the Muslim banks, or bring them in line with
their own international central banking system. Muslims have been intentionally made
to be scapegoats, all for money and the New World Order.
To say that all Muslims are terrorists is a racist slur of the
highest order, against
an extremely religious and devout people. There are arguably far more Jewish
terrorists than there are Muslim, but by the same logic applied to the nation of Islam, all Jews,
including the state of Israel, must also be considered terrorists. For that matter,
all Americans must be considered terrorists as well, since the CIA is probably
one of the greatest instigators of terror that this planet has ever known.
As an alleged "Christian" nation, we are supposed to know better
than to lump all people into one hate group, but quite sadly enough, the corrupt
Bush-Cheney administration fomented that ugly discourse, which our corporate media
was all too eager to sell to a naive and highly gullible public of TV junkies
and entertainment addicts. The resulting public illogic has been, "It must be true, because the
'"news person"' said it on television."
The Corporate Media: Aiding And Abetting The True Terrorists
If people only knew about JP Morgan's takeover of printed news in
1915, or of the CIA's own infiltration of the media through "Operation
Mockingbird," they would know better than to trust the media shills who
disseminate disinformation and propaganda. The Iraq war lie and the selling of
the false weapons of mass destruction story should have been enough for most intelligent
Americans to understand that the higher ups within the corporate media are there
to steer the news for the benefit of the self-appointed rulers of this world.
When news anchors such as Brian
Williams (NBC), Diane Sawyer (ABC), and Katie Couric (CBS) all belong to groups
such as the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) their journalistic oath has
undeniably been compromised. They are not the first to be used. Even Walter
Cronkite was said to be part of the CIA's domestic "Operation Mockingbird."
Rule number one in journalism is that the truth always comes
first. Entangling alliances that hinder that goal are expressly discouraged.
Hard to imagine why these supposed news people would voluntarily break such an
ethical code which would clearly taint their viability as honest journalists or
news reporters. Apparently they have been lulled into believing that they are
doing patriotic work, or that their association with the CFR is good for their
personal careers.
Consider this quote from
John Swinton, former Chief of Staff for the New York Times in an address
to the New York Press club.
"There
is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an
independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you
who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know
beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for
keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others
of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who
would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the
streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to
appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation
would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth;
to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon,
and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it
and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We
are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the
jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are
intellectual prostitutes."
John
Swinton, former Chief of Staff, The New York Times.
And also consider this
historical tidbit from David Rockefeller:
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The
New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications
whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their
promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been
impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had
been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those
years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to
march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty
of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable
to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
- David Rockefeller, 1991 Bilderberg
speech.
The corporate media are undeniably more of an enemy to "We the People" than any
foreign nationals who are alleged to be terrorists. The corporate media is owned
by the mega-wealthy of this world, our true enemies and oppressors. They are the
true terrorists to be dealt with.
The Promise of "Change"
The "change" that we are seeing in our world today has all been
carefully planned and manipulated. George HW Bush detailed his plans for the New
World Order to the world in an address, "coincidentally" on
9/11 of
1991. And then just ten years later, with his son George W. Bush placed into
power, we had the 9/11 attacks. Just another wild coincidence, I suppose.
It was under Bush II that we saw the greatest
violations of the U.S. Constitution, a direct assault, not on terrorists, but
the American people, through the heinous Patriot Act, the Military Commissions
Act, and the Hitler-copied Homeland Security Department. Through these bogus
acts, U.S. citizens have now been threatened by the elected government meant to
serve "We the People."
U.S. citizens can now be detained indefinitely, without trial, contrary to
our Bill of Rights and Constitution. Habeas Corpus has been thrown out the
window, so we can better fight the "evil-doers." The Bush-Cheney administration
followed every single point in the
Ten Steps To Close An Open Society. And now Obama is here to finish us
off.
It would most likely also surprise most entertainment addicted
Americans to know that we are STILL under the very same emergency orders set in
place after the 9/11 attacks. Now why would that possibly have to be? Are we
truly that weak that we cannot fight an enemy without tossing our Constitution
and our inalienable rights out the window? Seriously? If so, then the terrorists
have already won, because they allegedly have dismantled our country and the
"freedoms" that Bush II so moronically said had infuriated the terrorists. That
had to be the single biggest dumbass excuse that any idiot politician/crook
could ever attempt to make, but our corporate run bought-and-paid-for media ate
it up and spit it back out to the world.
Now enters Obama, supposedly the antithesis of Bush, and also the
hope for a
"change" back to better days, but he has been nothing of the sort.
(And we thought "Slick Willie" had the golden tongue.) The Obama-Biden
administration has been nothing more than a continuation of Bush principles,
and is for all intents and purposes, the Bush III regime.
No, this isn't change for the better folks. Our government cares
more about protecting corporate intellectual property rights than they do our
own personal private property rights. They've stolen our homes, bankrupted
millions, and done everything humanly possible to take down the middle class,
while slowly killing the lower class. No one did anything to the proven crooks
at Goldman Sachs. Wall Street was left unscathed and unpunished for their proven
crimes in destroying our economy. No one from the banks has been prosecuted for
perpetrating the predatory lending that bankrupted millions. Only Iceland had
the good sense to toss its bankers into prison, and for that the international banksters went after them.
And through it all, the Federal Reserve which
runs the show, continues on its
merry way, a private corporation not owned by our government, but by the
international banking cartel that is working against us all for their own New World
Order. This treasonous cabal is once again led by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans,
to name but a few. They have
stolen our forefathers' dream from us.
BP was allowed to pollute our Gulf for hundreds of years, killing
vast sea life and stealing the livelihood of so many who depend on its resources
for a simple life. BP was never punished. To add insult to injury, they have
now been allowed to once again drill in the same waters that they personally
destroyed.
The slick Obama campaign and the highly polished marketing theme of "change" was
nothing more than a ruse, a false truth and outrageous deception perpetrated on
a desperate public that was tired of nearly a decade of Bush II and the evil
Darth Cheney. We're getting change alright, but not for the better.
As with investigating any crime, you have to ask the question,
who truly benefits? The old adage in journalism is to follow the money, and the
trail always leads to the super-rich and those stealing our personal wealth and
freedom, all for their own greed and long planned New World Order. Those that can't
see this by now are so totally blinded by a corrupt and complicit media, they
wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in their fat couch-potato asses.
Those that do pay attention know full well who the real
terrorists and "evil-doers" are in this world. Do some research of your own into
the Rothschild family, as well as the Rockefellers and Morgans. There are more
than that, but these three families alone have truly been at the forefront of
all the wars and human suffering on this earth. They have undeniably done the
most damage to mankind.
There is a reason that Jesus once said, "It is easier for
a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into
the kingdom of heaven."
Another historical quote to take note of comes once
again from the Rockefellers:
“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family)
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of
conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global
political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the
charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
-David Rockefeller
If you really want change, start by waking your friends and
neighbors up to the real terrorism that exists on this planet. It's time that we
take our world back from the rich who have enslaved us all, and put them behind
bars where they deservedly belong.
More Related Reading:
American Coup
American Assault
Class Warfare
Return to
NewsFocus.org
|