None of This Political Nightmare Has Been a
|NewsFocus.org, Op-Ed by Tim Watts - 111116
As some people in this country vent their anger over the election of Donald J.
Trump, there are at least two camps of people who are having an entirely
opposite reaction... 1) those reveling in the win and basking in the glow of
victory, and 2) those hiding in fear for their lives as the chaos and calamity
threaten to descend upon their once peaceful neighborhoods.
As all of this is happening and being hyped up by the corporate news media, I am
quite saddened by the discourse that is taking place across the US, but I am
also not surprised, having already published an article the day before the
election entitled Prepare for a
Post-Election US Shift. It was inevitable that this would happen because it
was programmed to happen.
The fact of the matter is... when it comes to the circus and the mayhem of
the 2016 presidential election, this was no accident. Please know and
understand this absolute fact... that this election was
quite carefully and strategically put together and rigged, right from the get-go.
Creating Another US Divide
The 2016 US presidential election was an orchestrated fabrication by big $$$
power, carefully engineered to do exactly as it has done, to further divide this
nation. I have some glaring facts to substantiate this point, which I will share
in just a moment, so please hear me out.
It cannot be emphasized enough that all of this was preordained to happen
right from the very start, by those who have all the money and power to own
and control both political parties in this carefully crafted
bi-partisan union known as the United States of America.
FYI... our forefathers never intended for it to be this way... having
just two major political parties, because they knew that would only
divide and fracture their beloved nation in half. They were absolutely right.
When you think about it long enough, it's extremely embarrassing to refer to a
two-party political system as any form of real democracy. In reality, one can
only be an adversary for the other, as opposed to three, four or even five major
political parties, all jockeying for public support by offering a more enticing
political ideology than the others, with positive solutions to the everyday
problems of "we the people."
Instead, we are stuck within an archaic two-party political system that runs
akin to the major sports leagues of this country, focusing instead on an "Us vs
Them" mentality. We have the NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, and then there's US politics.
The Republicans and Democrats are as much about "team" and "loyalty" as the
Cowboys or the Red Sox... and that's a major problem with the US two-party
system, because people are loyal to a fault, when it comes to their
candidate, even if their candidate is "less than perfect" as a human being.
When the election is over, it's much like the day after the Super Bowl. You're
either excited because your team won, or you're depressed because your team lost.
That is the game known as American politics.
This has undeniably been the major downfall of the US political system, a system
that is supposed to be sacrosanct in maintaining democracy in support of the
The one thing that can be said of a two-party system is that it is much easier
to keep under control than a multiple party system, and... it can clearly be
quite divisive to the union.
This is something you'd think we would have an intimate education of in this
country, perhaps having learned just a wee bit between the years of 1861 and
1865, during the American civil war. Now, because of just two political
parties, this nation is torn once again.
I almost wrote "torn in half" to finish that last sentence, sort of as a
preconditioned rhetorical response, but stopped short of doing so because I
realize and know that MANY people were also extremely disenchanted with both
candidates. Many people across this country shared the exact same sentiment -
that this presidential field sucked when it came to a really great
candidate. (Even an average candidate.)
As a result, (and as designed) people were left to openly quibble over "the
lesser of two evils."
So after the stolen elections in 2000 and 2004, and broken campaign promises of
2008 and 2012, here we are one more time, once again screaming that the incoming
president is the worst ever, as if to suggest that there were subtle differences between
Hitler, Hess, and Himmler.
The fact is, they've all been bad.
Once again, the fact of the matter is, this chaos has been methodically
prepared and arranged for us.
Here is why this is so glaringly apparent.
According to the folks at
MorningConsult.com, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are the least
popular candidates in the modern era to ever run for president.
That is quite a phenomenal political stat to digest and also one that is most
As a researcher, I found this statistic to not only be outrageously fascinating,
but also curiously disturbing at the same time.
Seriously. It's a very, very revealing statistic, especially if you've been
following the degeneration of the US since 9/11.
As you can see from the graph below, Hillary has a 56% disapproval rate while
the Donald has a 58% disapproval rate.
Perhaps even more striking is the fact that there is also dissatisfaction with
each candidate from within their own party.
As many have asked before... this was the best presidential field that the two
political parties could come up with?
When have we ever seen one of the two political parties pick their least
favorable candidate, let alone both of them at the same time?
Okay, to be truthful, it actually happened in 2008 when both political parties
ran from their most popular candidates. The Democrats refused to nominate Dennis
Kucinich, while the Republicans balked at running Ron Paul, both of whom had
much larger grassroots support among the people than either Obama or McCain.
This happened again in 2012 when the RNC once again ran from Ron Paul, choosing
a tractionless, doomed Mitt Romney instead.
So, it has happened in the recent past, post-9/11.
Fast-forward now to election 2016, and here we go again. For many in the RNC the
mantra this election cycle became "Dump Trump," yet somehow, he
In the end we had the high-baggage Hillary vs. the sexist Trump.
How Did It Happen?
The big $$$ question we're left to answer afterwards is... why on earth would
any political party run its least favorable candidate?
It's extremely out of character, because these political machines do perceptive
research on the general populace far beyond the norm. They know absolutely
everything about the likes and dislikes of a candidate, as each pertains to the
voting populace. Because of this research, each party has a very intimate
knowledge of their candidate's strengths and weaknesses, and they know full well
how those will play to the voter.
So how is it then that we ended up with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump?
To top that question, here's an even bigger question... what are the odds
that BOTH political parties would run their worst candidates ever in the modern
era, in the same election?
Let me answer that by stating that there is no way that this is just a random
"coincidence of fate."
As mentioned, both parties do extensive polling and research. They
literally have the pulse of the nation at any given moment and know exactly what
to address, when to do it, and how to do it.
To think that we were given the worst that either party has ever delivered for a
US presidential election, at this point in our post-9/11 recovery, is
unequivocally no coincidence.
Like it or not, that's exactly what we were given in 2016, the worst candidates
ever. Judging from the tenor of the nation before and after the election, it
would appear that most people very much concur with such an assessment.
Two elections in a row we saw parties run from their best candidate, but
none perhaps more so than in 2016.
First off, Democrats far and away preferred Bernie Sanders to Hillary Clinton,
DNC rigged it so that Clinton won the primary.
Hillary was the most unelectable person in DNC history, so much so that
Michael Dukakis would have probably excited Democrats more.
On the RNC side, nearly every Republican was in the pool, each vying for
the nomination, yet in the end it was the candidate least expected that stayed
afloat, the one with the least amount of political and/or social correctness,
and also the most political liability.
That (IMHO) was a political key for the Clinton campaign, because the only way
for damaged-goods Hillary to stand any chance of getting elected was to get into
a fight with a known womanizer - and someone who wasn't politically correct in his
That is the election we got, but not the outcome we expected.
What are the odds that BOTH political parties
would run their worst candidates ever in the modern era, in the same
Divide & Conquer
Those that divided this nation did so by taking over both parties long ago
(1920's). Their goal was to make both parties dissimilar at the bottom, for the
appearance of the general public, yet at the top they would be similar, for the
powers that be (TPTB).
This has been glaringly transparent through the last four administrations as
policy in this country has not wavered significantly from party-to-party when it
comes to domestic prosperity and tranquility, versus a globalist agenda.
It is this author's contention, that's what 9/11 was all about, the big push for
the uber-rich's wet dream of a
new world order (NWO), run strictly by them of
Each US president since Reagan has brought new destruction to the sovereignty of the United
States, as well as dramatic new threats to its constitution since 9/11.
Under George HW Bush it was phase I, with
a cursory introduction to the NWO.
Also... NAFTA was originally conceived by the George HW Bush administration.
Bill Clinton handled phase II, setting up the downfall of the US through a
legislative overhaul on key government protections, such as Glass-Steagall and
the Telecommunications Act of 1996, among others.
George W Bush and Dick Cheney oversaw phase III, the 9/11 attacks and an
introduction to the bogus War on Terror, giving us the PATRIOT Act, Homeland
Security and TSA, etc, etc, etc.
Barack Obama was the wolf in sheep's clothing, sent in to calm the flock for
phase IV, while continuing the policies of his predecessor, and adding on to
those with more of his own, such as the SIP and NDRP. He also oversaw US treaty
involvement in TPP, TTIP, TSIA, and CETA, treaties that would further cement a
globalist union run by the super-rich.
And now we are on to phase V in the continued takedown of the US.
The Promise of False Hope
The last two presidential elections we have had someone promise to clean up the sins of the
past, yet afterwards they changed their tune.
In 2009, Obama reversed his earlier campaign promises to go after Bush & Cheney,
instead saying that it was time for the nation to look forward, rather than
looking backward at an ugly past.
This is the exact same thing that Bill Clinton
said after Iran-Contra, but then how could he prosecute for it when he was
deeply involved in it with George HW Bush in Mena, Arkansas?
Now, in 2016, we have Donald trump who says he is tired of the status quo and
wants to end the crony politics in America. He even said he would go so far as
to hire a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary and the Clinton Foundation.
Well, pardon me if I don't have a few reservations and just a tad bit of trepidation on
Trump going after the head of the snake, since the worst snakes of all are in the
Those particular people are good at creating divides amongst the populace. They are the
devious masters of it.
They furthered a divide of black vs. white under the watch of the first black US
president ever. That's quite a dubious achievement. Rather than bringing two
races together, as his election should have, racial tension in this country
became even greater after Obama's election than it
was before. That is no coincidence.
Now they've exacerbated the political divide in this country by running the
least liked candidates ever, thus fomenting anxiety and fear amongst the voting populace.
The only people who benefit from having a worse candidate in office are those
who were in office previously. It's hard to look so bad when the successor that
follows you is perceived as Genghis Khan.
Those that created this divide are the same people that created the new
Muslim-Christian divide, increased the black-white divide, and exploded the
left-right divide. Again, they are the masters of division.
Don't Give in to the Plan
So the next time you feel like tossing a brick through a storefront window, or
overturning a car and setting it on fire (because nothing says Democracy quite
like a flaming Volvo on its side) just remember that TPTB engineered and
orchestrated this entire event. They want people to react violently, because it
plays into their hands, for a further police state, or worse yet, martial law.
So, if you get angry over this election, you are just playing into their hands
by doing exactly as they want.
Why not recognize the obvious and instead focus your anger and disgust on those
who have the money and power to actually swing such a sordid election. (And if
you're thinking Soros or the Koch brothers, you need to think bigger, because
they're but only minions to the real power.)
It's time to go for the head of the snake, lest we get bit once again.
Prepare for a
Post-Election US Shift
The Fiasco Known as the 2016 US Presidential
Trump Now Says on :60-Minutes That
Clintons Are Good People
Unsure Over a Special
Prosecutor; Possibility of Unfulfilled Campaign Promise
Will Trump be like Clinton, Bush and Obama, and not prosecute